Gluten-Free Diets and “Cereal Killers”

August 17, 2010 by  
Filed under In the News

While hashing through my feed reader for the first time in AGES lately, I read with great interest a blurb about a book called Cereal Killers on Val’s cooking blog. (I also found some very cool ipod reviews, iPhone deals, and cell phone plans to research, but that’s for another story!).

Cereal Killers provides answers to many questions and concerns raised by new and long-time members of the gluten-free community. From associated illnesses to psychological issues, to the basics about the diet, this book provides useful information for everyone, especially to those who are not yet aware that they should also be following a gluten-free diet. This new book explores signs, symptoms, and appropriate testing, along with dietary compliance and factors that influence these important issues.

This patchwork quilt of information is a must-have for every home library where gluten induced illness is either present or suspected. Cereal Killers is also important reading for those who suffer from vague symptoms of ill health but do not yet have a diagnosis.

WOW!

This confirms many of my own suspicions about cereal and gluten in the diet. I do believe that gluten gluts the American diet. Gluten coupled with the excesses of high-fructose corn syrup in our foods makes us fat, sick, and lethargic.

Historically, people ate high-protein meals for breakfast, such as eggs and sausage, whole-wheat johnny cakes with molasses, or fruits. Sometime in the early 20th century (if I am getting my time correct), a man named William Kellogg (a Christian Scientist) wanted to promote the grain industry, and he believed that Americans needed more grain in their diets. He created Kellogg’s breakfast cereal. It’s been a long time since I have read up on this, so my facts may be a little sketchy… but cereal became a staple in Americans’ diets then.

There’s a movement underway in America to return to fresh fruits and vegetables as the staple in our diet. It’s like it’s some kind of revolution, the way the food industry is acting. It challenges us to take a good hard look at the foods we are given to eat, and ask WHY must we eat these things. I stopped one day and asked myself that question. On the grocery shelves, there’s Choice A and Choice B and Choice C and Choice D. But there is really very little difference between all the choices. WHY do I have to eat this stuff? WHY should I believe that it is healthy for me? WHY are vegetables– which are so easily grown and are not “manufactured” in factories– so much more expensive than Doritos and hot dogs and sausage– which is made in factories by many workers? How can this be?

Anyway, I think it’s GOOD that we are presenting these questions, and changing our diets. I think I may check out this book, Cereal Killers. If I can ever get the time to read!!!

FDA Barking Up Wrong Tree

April 20, 2010 by  
Filed under In the News

Oh brother.

FDA takes aim at salt content in processed food

The Food and Drug Administration is planning an unprecedented effort to gradually reduce the salt consumed each day by Americans, saying that less sodium in everything from soup to nuts would prevent thousands of deaths from hypertension and heart disease. The initiative, to be launched this year, would eventually lead to the first legal limits on the amount of salt allowed in food products.

The government intends to work with the food industry and health experts to reduce sodium gradually over a period of years to adjust the American palate to a less salty diet, according to FDA sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the initiative had not been formally announced.

Officials have not determined the salt limits. In a complicated undertaking, the FDA would analyze the salt in spaghetti sauces, breads and thousands of other products that make up the $600 billion food and beverage market, sources said. Working with food manufacturers, the government would set limits for salt in these categories, designed to gradually ratchet down sodium consumption. The changes would be calibrated so that consumers barely notice the modification.

OK, now I’m ALL for making processed foods healthier. BUT– and these are important buts–

  • Salt is used as a preservative for processed foods. So if you don’t process foods with salt, what are you going to process them with? Chemicals? I much rather have salt than chemicals!
  • Some of the ingredients in some processed foods are subsidized by the government. The ingredients in processed foods: sugars, corn syrup, etc etc, are all subsidized by bills.
  • Processed foods are often promoted or made available by the government. Take a peek at what’s being served up in public schools, senior centers, prisons, etc. A lot of those meals are processed.
  • Our entire post-WW II culture was built on processed foods. It was viewed as being patriotic for the mom to serve processed foods to the family so she could volunteer or work outside the home.
  • Why is junk food more expensive than fruits and vegetables? Because the junk foods are subsidized by the government, and can keep the prices low. I recently watched the movie “Food Inc,” and while not much of the information was new to me, a lot of it was confirmation of good ol’ common sense. For one– the biggest factor in obesity cases is INCOME. That’s just mind-boggling, but it’s very true. Rich people can afford fresh fruits and vegetables. Poor people have to settle for canned fruits and vegetables, and eat meals heavy in meats and fats. Why is this?! It’s not because rich folks can afford fat burners, no. It’s because rich folks can afford to eat healthy, while poor people can not.

Most importantly– why doesn’t the FDA address the problems with corn syrup?? That’s the real crucible. Corn syrup is EVERYWHERE and corn is heavily subsidized and protected by government interests.

I think the FDA should quit throwing up smoke screens and turn to its own house: slash any governmental deals with subsidized food industry bigwigs, and corn syrup makers. Get that crap out of our food. I know that a lot of the major media corps have stated that there is no real data that corn syrup is bad for us, but I have a few things to point out: one, who has done those studies that say corn syrup is harmless? Those who have a vested interest in the corn syrup industry (answer: yes, at least as far as I have seen); two, the widespread introduction of corn syrup into our foods began in the 1970s. At that same time and since then, our country has suffered an explosion of obesity and health problems. Coincidence? Come on, quit the lab rats stuff– we’re talking about historical data.

It’s all definitely food for thought, it is.

It’s time to grow locally, people!